Splice (2010)

Being Film #7 in Hail Horror 5


There comes a point about three quarters of the way through Vincenzo Natali's SPLICE, his 21st century cross-bred homage to the Frankenstein story that significantly changes the stakes of what you've seen up to this point.  And you're going to make a split-second decision in your head as to whether you can accept that this is actually happening and carry on, or if you think a line's been crossed and you turn it off.  There's a small chance that you might think, "What's the big deal?  That's not so bad," and just keep watching, never giving it a second thought.


If you're one of those folks (or even if you're not), I urge you to read the always-awesome Vern and his review of the film, which goes into a lot of spoiler details addressing this moment.  Then think again about what you just watched, and either marvel or cringe at what Natali and company got away with in a mainstream summer release.

SPLICE is the story of Clive and Elsa, an aptly named pair of  punk rock hipster genetic scientists played by Adrien Brody and Sarah Polley.  I want to stress this description because the beginning of the film is fairly distracting and just a bit silly: Brody attends meetings dressed in slick checkered suits and ironic t-shirts.  Polley wears knee high combat boots and both work in lab coats covered in faux military patches.  I don't know what Natali's trying to get across with this, except to say, "Hey, look at us!  We're young and cool and brilliant and utterly incapable of knowing our limits!"  Actually, that's probably exactly what he was trying to get across based on what happens to them, but it seems so out of place at first, and then basically gets lost in the shuffle as the movie goes on.  Clive and Elsa have just successfully spliced together the genes of different animals and come up with Fred and Ginger, two phallic worm creatures whose proteins can be the basis for a number of medical vaccines and potential cures.  Great job, and for them the logical next step is to mix a little human DNA into the mix.

From here on in we're treading some familiar territory, as what happens is a twisted version of the Frankenstein myth, although instead of a lumbering, shunned gargantuan, we're treated to Dren, a delicate female with the legs of a bird and a tail with a nasty stinger.  What SPLICE does exceptionally well with this conceit is to have Clive and Elsa, whose relationship is on edge due to the whole child issue, come face to face with their problems in the form of the newly created life.  Yes, it's an experiment that was never supposed to come to term, but now that it's here, what are their responsibilities?  Where does the experiment end and being a parent begin? Natali does a great job in the second act asking these questions and giving Brody and POlley enough room to really address these questions both as scientists and as new parents, as Dren ages in short order from a tadpole-looking "thing" straight out of David Lynch's mind and into an exotic, beautiful young woman.

Lest you think this is another case of MONSTERS, where the promise of horror is nowhere to be found, rest assured: one thing Natali knows how to do is wring some genuine horror and suspense from a scene.  Early on in the film Clive and Elsa are summoned to the lab in the middle of the night: the experiment has come to term and is ready to be born out of a synthetic "womb".  It's a terrifically intense sequence, no one being sure exactly what's going to come out of the rapidly expanding bag.  Another, later sequence goes even further as Elsa and Clive, thinking they're about to kill the experiment before anyone finds out, soon discovers it's missing, having evolved into something entirely different.  The eventual unveling of Fred and Ginger and the effects of that is both horrific and utterly hilarious, not least because the scene has Brody and Polley dressed like rock stars addressing a science community of tuxedo-clad aristocracy.

The effects for Dren in all stages of her life are remarkable for such a small picture, and go a long way to making SPLICE a worthwhile experience - it's refreshing to see see something so alien, so different than what we've come to expect from a film of this type.  In her adult form Dren is played by Delphine Chanéac in an eerie, cat-like performance.  As she gets older and begins to express the questions and desires of any normal young person, the film gets better and better until the aforementioned pivotal moment in the picutre, where something you suspect might happen does indeed happen, with a gusto and relish that's horrifying...

...and then the film backs down.  As much as I enjoyed SPLICE for it's originality and willingness to address some interesting issues, instead of taking those questions further after, the film devolves into a "let's kill the monster" climax.  It's a little unsettling to see how quickly the unnamed sequence is glossed over to make way for a generic chase in the woods and the now I see it coming from a mile away ending.  It's almost like Natali was stopped from exploring the themes he was interested as soon as the film was picked up for major distribution.  What happens in its place isn't necessarily bad, just a bit too traditional for what could have been a truly creepy and substantial movie.  SPLICE is still a movie I would recommend for any horror fan looking for something different, and at the very least to provoke discussion as to what Natali was shooting for, how we feel about it, and what's left to do in a modern horror film.

Oh, that's right...THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE. We've come so far...

The Stendhal Syndrome (1996)

 Being Film #6 in Hail Horror 5

Before writing this I went back and read the previous reviews I've written on Dario Argento films (for those curious, TENEBRE, PHENOMENA, and FOUR FILES ON GREY VELVET), and the same theme crops up again and again: even when things don't make a lick of sense, Argento is such a visually striking director it becomes easy to fall into his films and enjoy the ride.  So far I've been lucky in my selection of his work: besides the above, I've luxuriated in the saturated colors of SUSPIRIA and marveled at the ingenuity on display in works as early as THE BIRD WITH THE CRYSTAL PLUMAGE and the Godfather of giallo films, DEEP RED.  But that was the trick; Argento has a large enough discography you can bounce around and find classic after classic and take a while before you bump into a clunker like THE MOTHER OF TEARS.  The general rule seems to be, stick to the early stuff - anything in the last twenty years and you're in danger of some serious crummery.

But I had heard a lot of good things about THE STENDHAL SYNDROME, the first Italian film to use CGI, and it certainly didn't hurt that Argento cast his lovely daughter Asia as the lead, and since it was available in HD on Netflix Instant Streaming I curled up in bed Saturday morning and checked it out.

Boasting another great score by Ennio Morricione, THE STENDHAL SYNDROME stylistically feels right at home alongside his other great giallo films of the 70s and early 80s.  Asia Argento is Anna Manni, a policewoman from Rome recently arrived in Florence to compare notes with the local law about a vicious rapist who has lately started murdering his victims with a shot through the head.  She receives a call from a stranger stating the killer is indeed in Florence, and will be at the world famous Uffizi Gallery.  Anna goes on her own to see if he's there, but becomes entranced by the sheer volume of art on display, and falls prey to the Stendhal Syndrome, a real-life affliction where the person becomes faint and can even hallucinate at the sight of beautiful or large amounts of art.  In Anna's case, she falls into a painting of an ocean where an enormous fish promptly swims up and begins to make out with her.

Yeah, so right away we're kind of back in Ken Russell territory, but the scene, surreal as it is, serves as the template for Anna's condition, and is used as an indicator for her sanity throughout the film.  Anna, now slightly amnesiac, is helped up by Alfredo, a young man who witnesses the event and helps her with her belongings.  She returns to her hotel room, still dazed by what happened and is confronted by another painting which opens up as a doorway, allowing her to travel back in time to the scene of the crime that brought her to Florence. While the remarked-upon CGI is a little shoddy in certain places (there's an odd scene of Anna swallowing some pills that we watch travel through her system), when it comes to the paintings coming to life and transporting her it's surprisingly effective.  After walking through the doorway and reliving the events that prompt her police chief to send her to Florence, Anna walks back to her room and regains her memory.  It sounds crazy, but these sequences find Argento perfectly in his element, using his signature dream logic to give everything a spaced-out feeling.

But as soon as she returns to reality things take a startling turn as Alfredo appears in her room, now revealed as (surprise) the killer and has been tracking her ever since she left Rome.  I'm used to violence in film, and in particular to violence in Argento films, where everything takes on a surreal, fetishistic tone.  THE STENDHAL SYNDROME, though, pushes the envelop for what I'm comfortable with: Alfredo, unmasked so early, brutally rapes Anna, cutting her lips with a razor blade he keeps in his month, and punching her to keep her screaming all the while.  It's extremely unsettling, and Argento is unforgiving in the way he shoots it, using intense close-ups of Alfredo playing with the razor in his mouth, the drops of blood that stain the sheets, and the terrified, sweat-soaked face of Anna.  Mercifully she's knocked unconscious, only to have the brutality kicked up another notch when she wakes up in a car next to another woman getting raped and then shot by Alfredo, who gazes at Anna through a hole in the dead woman's face:

Anna escapes, but the experience leaves lasting effects: she can't stop thinking about what happened, can't stand the thought of being so defenseless, and how that is tied into her gender.  She cuts her hair severely short, begins dressing in slacks and jackets, won't let her boyfriend touch her (in another brutal scene she winds up frantically assaulting him), takes up boxing with her brother.  I think the other real surprise besides the viciousness of her rape is the the amount of realistic psychological damage Argento injects into the story.  In the past with films like FOUR FLIES ON GREY VELVET and  to a lesser extent DEEP RED and TENEBRE the mental instability (for lack of a better term) of the victims or the killers seemed tacked on, used for shock effect without really diving into the grit and realism those conditions would have on the person.  Here it feels much more tangible, and that realism adds to the tragedy we feel as Anna's sanity slowly starts to crumble.  It should be noted that Asia Argento is fantastic as Anna, convincing us in every scene of the pain and torment she's in, whether it's having a tortuous dinner with her family or being trapped in the clutches of Alfredo...

..which happens again, halfway through the film in an extended scene that's even worse than what came before.  However this time the tables are turned and Anna not only manages to escape, but to inflict some serious revenge on Alfredo (there's a truly twisted moment involving bed springs) before kicking him to his death over a cliff.  The only trouble is, when the police arrive they can't find the body...

This would be the ending for most films, but we're only an hour into THE STENDHAL SYNDROME, which now takes a left turn as Anna physically transforms again, donning a platinum blonde wig and falling in love with Marie, an exchange student from France who works at the local museum.  Argento always manages to make the most of his sets and locations, achieving a wonderful sense of skewered balance by accentuating different aspects of the scene.  The museum where Marie works is a perfect example, the workers dwarfed by the gargantuan sculptures that lay haphazardly (but oh so carefully arranged) around the room:


Let's see: large, white stone heads and arms, all detached from bodies in a museum?  What do you think the chances are those statues will be covered with blood soon?

If you said, "pretty good" give yourself a pat on the back.

The ending of THE STENDHAL SYNDROME leads you in one direction and then takes a left turn that, while not all that surprising, is still surprisingly effective and ends on a more somber note that I would have thought. It was said that originally Asia Argento was going to reprise her role in a sequel of sorts but scheduling issues changed that plan (the film was cast with another lead and turned into the not-so-well received THE CARD PLAYER in 2004).  Based on what happens in THE STENDHAL SYNDROME, that would have been an interesting film indeed.  But at least we have this, a surprisingly good, mature film from coming so much later in a career that seemed to have peaked 15 years before.  Let's hope there's more to be had from such a singular voice in horror cinema.

Hail Horror 5: The First Batch

Yeah, yeah...I've been away from here for a while.  Whenever life offered up a bucketful of challenges I would in the past retreat to writing.  And I have done that, just not here at Geek Monkey.  I've been working hard since the end of August to get Celluloid Moon back on track and build up connections with film blogging community, and after a lengthy resuscitation the site's finally starting to breathe on its own again.

So for that reason instead of posting the Hail Horror entries in their entirety this year I'm going to link back to them on Celluloid Moon.  Please drop by and check out the articles and the comments from the community - I've tried doing a few different things this year and the results have been pretty good.

Have no fear, though - instead of a boring old list of links here are a few choice images from each of the films I've covers so far:

Horror of Dracula (1958)

Session 9 (2001)

Prince of Darkness (1897)

Village of the Damned (1960, 1995)Monsters (2010)Gothic (1986)

With only 11 days to go in October my hope is to get baker's dozen done - I have two more films done and half-way written, and more than enough choices and recommendations to choose from.  And then I'll probably slow down.  I'd like to get about 4 extensive reviews done a month, with smaller "quick hits" and other articles rounding things out.

After that, it's time to pay some attention to this dusty old place again.  I have a bunch of ideas, including music, photography, and assorted shenanigans.  So if you're one of the few people that stopped by here every once in a while, don't despair: we'll be back!

Meme: 15 Directors


Ah, the Internet Meme.  If it weren't for the proliferation of these dastardly virtual viruses we'd probably all be a lot more productive but not nearly as entertained.  I caught this particular bug from J.D. over at Radiator Heaven, who apparently was infected after seeing the kickoff over at Films From the Supermassive Black Hole and the most righteous posting over at The Dancing Image.

The easy part is coming up with the list.  From J.D.'s post:

List off the first 15 directors that come to your head that have shaped the way you look at movies. You know, the ones that will always stick with you. Don't take too long to think about it.
After about a minute or so I had about 20 directors.  This list is simply the first 15 I scribbled down, with the bonus 16th cleverly concealed in the image above (try and figure it out!).

The harder part was deciding how to visually present the list.  I'd love to take some time and care with this and use video clips like MovieMan0283 did (seriously, his entry is a crash-course in film and should be checked out), but for now I'll follow J.D.'s steps and use simple images of the people themselves:

Michael Curtiz


Howard Hawks

Akira Kurosawa

Woody Allen

Alfred Hitchcock

The Coen Brothers

Guillermo del Toro

Orson Welles

Martin Scorsese

Jean-Pierre Melville

Jean-Luc Godard

Francis Ford Coppola

David Lynch

Terry Gilliam

Ingmar Bergman

There are, of course, others that should be on this list - Spielberg was right below Kubrick, Tarantino was below him, and John Huston just slipped my mind until I started looking for pictures.  But these are the one that came to my head first, and they're in no particular order with the exception of Michael Curtiz, who doesn't get enough credit as a director, and has the distinction of directing the  #1 and #2 films on my list of all-time favorites.

Over the next few months I'll come back and revisit each of these directors and shed a little light on why their films have affected the way I look at not only cinema but the world.  In the meantime, enjoy the pics (I tried to keep to a certain style) and let me know who would be on your list.

My Two Cents on The Social Network (2010)

It's a good movie.  A really good movie, entertaining as hell and filled with great acting, spectacular direction and a score that is so perfectly attuned to the action on the screen it's almost eerie.

That being said, it's not my favorite film of the year, and I cringe a little whenever I see the words "masterpiece" or "game-changer" tossed about.  Like any movie (or every movie), there are choices I don't agree with, things that are clunky or don't work, but none of that should take away from what is a excellent look at the lengths people will go to to try and connect, to fit in within a larger circle, and the things they may lose along the way.

There are many excellent reviews out there in the film blog community: I went into a lot more detail regarding what I did and didn't like in the comments on Ryan Kelly's excellent post on Medfly Quarantine. I also referenced Tony Dayoub's review from Cinema Viewfinder, equally outstanding.  Clicking on the comments from both sites will lead to many more great opinions on THE SOCIAL NETWORK, some positive, some negative, but all informed, intelligent, and well worth your time whether you agree with the findings or not.