Man On Wire (2008)

"Why? Why is he doing it?"

The question of why is asked by a passerby to Annie, who is on the street in New York City pointing and shouting at her lover who is seemingly floating high in the air between the newly constructed Twin Towers of the World Trade Center. As she relates this portion of the story in the amazing documentary MAN ON WIRE, she expresses her utter bafflement to the question. Her answer is, simply, why not?

What director James Marsh has done is taken the story of Phillippe Petit, a French tightrope walker obsessed with the idea of performing a high-wire act atop the towers and created a documentary both beautiful and magical, an artful balance of different tones and styles that mimic the ethereal actions of Petit and his crew. He's helped by the fact that Petit is a born performer, charming and enthusiastic in his interviews, who also had the foresight to extensively film much of the planning and practice that went into his eventual triumph in New York. Marsh takes this footage and skillfully combines it with interviews and narration not only by Petit, but most of the people involved in executing the plan.

Although "plan" doesn't do justice to the events that transpire to get Petit up in the air. Some of the posters advertising MAN ON WIRE call it a "heist" film, and that's as good a name as any. The structure of the movie could have been lifted from any number of 50's crime films, and Marsh uses this to his advantage, blending the real life footage with dramatic reenactments, shot in black and white in an often surreal, film noir style perfectly matched to the music of composer Michael Nyman, much of which had been used in the films of Paul Greengrass. These sequences, such as when Petit and one of his crew are forced to sit under a tarp for hours as they wait for a security to leave the floor so they can begin to lug their equipment to the roof is blends an equla does of suspense and humor, and work better than many similar works that are straight dramatic fiction.

All of that is put aside once Petit sets his foot upon the wire, and the actual footage coupled with his own account during his performance is breathtaking. There's footage taken from the time of one of the arresting officers who states, "I don't think I'll ever see anything like this again."

It's his words that I'll take away from MAN ON WIRE more than anything else. He gets it. Phillippe Petit's display doesn't require explanation: it is a pure act of magic, done with wires and poles, a gift to himself and a gift to those able to witness something none of them could possibly have imagined when they woke up that morning and got ready to head into work.

Some are always in need of an explanation, of the "why". Others are content with the simple existence of that which they see.

The Year in Books

2008 was a slow year personally for book reading.  I wound up reading 49 books this year - not too bad considering all the other things that were occupying my time:

  1. My son
  2. My son
  3. XBox 360 in general and specifically Rainbow Six: Vegas, Gears of War I and II, and currently Fable II
  4. My wife/blogging (tie)
  5. My son

My Fiction Book of the Year for 2008 was hands-down Gilead by Marilynne Robinson (reviewed here).  From a literary and emotional standpoint it knocked me flat on my feet.  Plus it has the benefit (I think, anyway) of being recommendable to anyone interested in a good book - Gilead is one of those rare instances where the story and the language transcend genre.

There were two runner-ups for fiction, and to my surprise they were both fantasy novels - a genre I hadn't paid a lot of attention to for a number of years.  Both The Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman (reviewed here) and The Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss (reviewed here) combined a masterly love of language, humor, and beautiful imagery to tell wonderful stories that stayed embedded in my head for days and weeks afterward.

Of all the books I reviewed this year, my Nonfiction Book of the Year for 2008 was the first book I read in 2008 and coincidentally the first book I reviewed at Un:Bound.  Consider the Lobster (reviewed here) is an eclectic array of pieces by the late, great, David Foster Wallace, who tragically took his life back in September.  Wallace was and still is one of my literary heroes, and his death hit me like a ton of bricks.  I wrote about his suicide over at Geek Monkey, and to this day I still think about his essays and stories whenever I begin to write anything of length or consequence.

Although I didn't review it for any blogs, I wanted to also give a special mention to American Movie Critics: An Anthology from the Silents Until Now.  It's a fantastic overview of how the art of film criticism has evolved from the silent era to the Internet era, and is full of incredible essays and reviews from people as diverse as Carl Sandburg, Pauline Kael, Roger Ebert and Nathan Lee.  As I start up my film blog I've been using this book as my bible for how I want to structure and express my thoughts on film.  But it's much more than textbook examples of how to write about film - it's also a collection of superb writing from any standpoint.

That's it for 2008.  2009, here we come!

Buildings Through Glass

Two weeks ago the Missus and I drove into Manhanntan with her parents for a family reunion on her father's side.  After getting off the 59th Street Bridge I took out my cell phone and took these shots of an ivy covered building through the moon roof of my father-in-law's CR-V:

The reunion party was much better than any of us anticipated - this side of my wife's family has a lot of bad blood between people, and there were fears of arguments and grandstanding from the hosts. 

But none of that happened; we were there to celebrate family, specifically how everyone was there on account of the elders of the family, Rocco and Josephine, who came over to America in order to make a better life for their children.  Well into their 80's, husband and wife sat in the middle of the ballroom as a representative from each table was asked to come up to the band stage and say a few words about the family.

When the time came for someone to speak from our table, my father-in-law asked me to do it.  He's prone to get emotional at these types of things, and we all knew that if he tried to speak, he'd cry.  So I agreed, and went up and took the microphone.

I spoke about how happy I was to see everyone, and how great is was that we could all come together.  And since I was not directly here as a blood relative, I wanted to speak on behalf of everyone there who had the honor, privilege and joy to be married into the family.  At this point I had already consumed more than my normal (normal typically being "1") amount of cocktails, so I also began to choke up a bit.  I mumbled out a few more thanks and went back to my table.

A few hours of dancing, eating, and laughing later we made our way through the families, saying our goodbyes and promising to get in touch with each other more often.  When we got to Rocco he kissed me on the cheek (kissing between men in Italian culture is a big deal, so I usually manage to curb my aversion to being touched by people I don't know) and said thank you.  I had gotten a lot of compliments that night and was feeling pretty high about the whole event.

------------------------------

Yesterday morning we got the news that Rocco died in his sleep.  This weekend we're all getting back together again, and for the life of me I wish we weren't.

Whenever I close my eyes all I see are buildings stretching out above me.

Prisoner No More

Patrick McGoohan, star of the classic television show The Prisoner died at age 80.  Not only was he an icon for his role as Number 6 ("I am not a number...I am a free man!") in the crazy spy show that is more than a little influential to current hits like Lost, but he was also the guiding hand behind the show, writing, producing, and directing the majority of the 17 episodes.

Over at Scanners Jim Emerson posted a terrific video essay about the opening credits of the show, complete with narration.

You can also check out the entire 1967 series streaming online for free over at American Movie Classics (www.amc.tv).  They're currently in production on a miniseries remake of the show.

Breathless (1959)

BREATHLESS may not have been the movie to "officially" kick off the French New Wave, but after its release there was little doubt it would be the standard bearer for the movement. Written and directed by Jean-Luc Godard based off a treatment by Francois Truffaut, BREATHLESS leaps off the screen and tears into its story with a youthful exuberance that embraces its roots in American genre films while gleefully tearing apart the staid tenets of how those films are structured.

This was my introduction to Godard, and watching it for the first time I was amazed at how fresh and exciting it feels almost 50 years after its initial release. Roger Ebert hails it as the beginning of the modern movie, and the most influential debut since Orson Welles and CITIZEN KANE, and it's hard not to think the same. The story centers on Michel, a small time gangster who idolizes Humphrey Bogart and the materialistic freedoms of America - the cars, the movies, and the women. BREATHLESS opens with Michel nonchalantly stealing a car, and as he tears through the countryside Godard demonstrates what makes this a "modern" movie - Michel's mouth motors as quick as his car, and as he goes from topic to topic Godard's "jump cutting" technique is introduced - the editing almost seems to stutter, catching the dialog just after it begin only to clip just before it ends. The technique forces the viewer to become a participant in the conversation, desperately trying to keep up with what Michel is saying - a hopeless cause. For a brief moment he even turns to the camera, breaking the fourth wall and even more directly drawing the viewer into his world before he's off again, daring us to catch up. Soon he's stopped by the police and, having found a gun in the glove compartment, suddenly kills the patrolman in what looks to be a quick, gut reaction to getting caught. This sets up the rest of the story as Michel attempts to collect enough money to leave the country with Patricia, an American girl he fancies after a brief fling some time before.

But while the actual plot points of BREATHLESS are ripped directly from the Western gangster films of the 40s and 50s, the execution of the plot is anything but a retread. The editing is wonder at both ends of the spectrum - the jump cutting is continuously used to great effect, acting as a visual companion to the pace and tone of Michel's comments and eyeline. During a cab ride he tells Patricia how beautiful she is; the editing not only clips the dialog into brief, aural impressions but visually accents her face, her neck, wherever his eyes roam.

But what also stands out are the long, uninterrupted takes that echo the languid, bored moods of Michel and Patricia, especially in one particular scene up in her apartment. Michel spends the majority of the time trying to convince Patricia to sleep with him, but the movement and pacing betrays his boredom by not cutting away and focusing on his slow body movements and the endless little bits of distractions between them. The lighting is mostly natural, sunlight filtering through cigarette smoke in a haze that further enhances the feeling of emptiness insider the characters.

BREATHLESS also plays with unconventional methods of communicating the story. Michel walks down a street and the camera lingers on a passing sign that reads, "Live Dangerously Until the End!" Rather than show the police closing in on Michel, Godard uses newspapers and scrolling marquee signs flashing bulletins as Michel coincidentally drives by to signal their progress. And in perhaps the most ironic moment of the movie, a passerby who recognizes Michel and points him out to police is none other than Godard himself, thus directing the course of the film simultaneously in front of and behind the camera.

Would this movie have worked with different actors? It's hard to say, because what Jean-Paul Belmondo brings to Michel is an oddball electricity that would be hard to replace. Big, pouty lips and a broad nose, up close he looks far from the typical matinee idol, but his lithe movements and boundless charm make it easy to understand why he was a top drawer in France for so many years. His Michel is all sheen and bravado up front with a frightened kid just below the skin, and nowhere after the first five minutes of the film is it believed he's as tough as he claims to be. Even his tough guy actions - the initial murder, the muggings and bullying threats, betray a scared indecision, a life purposely without direction.

And the first moment Jean Seberg appears on-screen, walking up and down the street selling newspapers with her New York Herald t-shirt, it's impossible to look away. She's gorgeous and enigmatic and in her own way just as empty inside as Michel. There's a weird detachment to her actions and words that speaks to a coldness Michel never recognizes until it's too late. She announces she's pregnant, but the way she says it feels clinical, as if looking for a reaction from Michel. Is it true? She speaks to a friend and potential lover earlier where her condition is perhaps obliquely referenced, but that may have been a lie as well. Later, she coldly manipulates Michel's capture because, her thinking goes, if she can do something bad to him, it proves that she doesn't really love him. This sets up the wonderfully iconic ending, and one of the best last lines in movies, as Michel meets his end and maybe gets a glimpse of reality before the movie ends.

All together, BREATHLESS works to create a fresh and clear starting line for many of the things taken for granted on modern films. It celebrates American cinema even as it makes a case for the new wave of French cinema. The plot, characters, and style all coalesce into something where, for once, the reputation is less than adequate.